Friday

Generation Dumb

Posted by Jeannette at 1:02:00 AM
Summary
“Generation M” starts off by saying how children and adolescents have always had a major effect on new media and how people have always given attention to the role of media in children, ranging from the how the Brothers Grimm edited their fairy tales to social scientists actively studying children and media. It gives statistics on how much media has changed from the mid 20th century to the beginning of the 21st century and provides statistics on a wide range of new media objects present in American homes such as the number of televisions in each household, the number of computers, and the amount of video games children and adolescents possess. It concludes by stating that the average young person spends six and a half hours a day using media and that over a quarter of the time a person is using media they are using two or more forms of media simultaneously. The study found that in homes where parents control the amount of time their children are exposed to media the more they read and the less they watch television, play video games and use the computer. One conclusion was a fairly obvious one, which states that a child with some form of media in their room will also use other forms of media more.

The video states that multi-tasking is not effective and argues that this generation of students is far below the level of previous generations. It supports its claim by showing a student who says he has not read a book in years and that he simply uses a website such as SparkNotes, where he can learn the content an entire novel in five minutes. It also goes on to say that professors are no longer able to assign books that are longer than two hundred pages because they know that students are simply not going to read the book, rather they will find other ways to learn the material.


Inquiry

I was surprised by the conclusions of the study but, unfortunately, it was not a huge shock. It is evident that new media is being overused and can be seen by something as basic as someone telling their children dinner is ready by calling their cell phone instead of telling them in person and watching television while eating dinner, something that was previously strictly a time for family with no other distractions. The study was done six years ago, and the use of media has only increased dramatically since then. There has been no attempt to stop the overuse of media and media use shows no signs of declining. As for being the dumbest generation, with such a large quantity of resources available online providing anything from a simple summary to a character analysis to an in-depth discussion about the plot of a story, it is easy to see how students would gravitate towards the less time-consuming route and simply use a readily available source, such as SparkNotes. In previous years, technology was not as advanced and information was not as readily available, meaning students were forced to complete their assignments in order to pass the class. Now, with a multitude of distractions such as social networking sites and other forms of new media, most students prefer to spend less time on homework and more time using new media so the depth of the completion of assignments depends on how accurate the quick information found online was.


1. Do you believe that this generation of students really is “dumber” than previous generations?

2. Do you feel that the growth of new media is what is to blame for what is now known as the dumbest generation and what do you feel needs to change in order for this generation to get rid of that title?

3. Do you agree with the reading and how do you feel the use of media has changed since it was written?

11 comments

Alyssa on April 23, 2010 at 9:40 AM said...

So often we hear our parents say "When I was your age we didn't have our own laptops, cell phones, or TV's," implying that due to the increased prevalence of digital media in our lives we are suddenly far lazier than they were "at our age." As mentioned in class, there has been a lot of comparison of today's generation to the "good old days," but I feel that because all of the research being conducted on Generation X is done by an older generation, there is cause for bias. Do I think that our current generation is "dumber" than previous generations? Pop culture, technological advances, and changes in the overall standard of living of today aren't compatible with previous generations so to compare today's generations with the past seems superfluous.

The skills being cultivated in today's generation are different - critical thinking, the expectations to excel anything our parents did, and the overwhelming pressure to be the best has created a generation of over-achieving but over-extended kids. Extra-curricular activities, leadership roles, and preparing ones resume for college applications suddenly take over your life pre-college and it's these kids who appear "lazy" for not reading a book simply because they don't have enough time in the day. We are the generation of hyper-extended, over-achievers who wish to accomplish tasks with the least amount of effort. Efficiency seems to be the push for the future - why should how we expend our time and effort for daily tasks be any different?

Kyle Stephens on April 23, 2010 at 3:22 PM said...

I do agree that many individuals who claim that the previous generation was "smarter" are relishing in the "good ol' days," but I think they also have a point. I read about a study the other day that look at a student's average length of education as a function of the number of books each child's parents had in the house. The study can be found here: http://www.miller-mccune.com/culture-society/home-libraries-provide-huge-educational-advantage-14212/ .

In short, a child in the US will average 2.4 more years of education (i.e. college or advanced degrees) if his or her parents have 500 books or more in their home. Now, this study may say more about parents than the influence of new media, but what I draw from this study is the idea that books are very influential educational tools. It is hard to view many new media devices as educational tools when these same devices allow you to watch movies and listen to music.

Kelseya on April 23, 2010 at 5:53 PM said...

I don’t think that this generation of students is dumb, but less focused. There are so many gadgets that people are using to interact with one another that they get caught up in the technology and focus on their original intent. If you go to the library to study, you will see that most of the students have their ipod in their ears while they are working on a paper. As someone who gets distracted really easily, I don’t see how they can focus on whatever homework they should be working on. I know that when I study, I have to put myself in a room that doesn’t have my computer or t.v., because I will get distracted, and can’t focus on what I am supposed to do.
I think that it is terribly sad that this generation are not avid readers in comparison to past generations, and I think it is due mostly to our society’s need to have things immediately. Why would anyone bother to read a book when they can get the answers and plot from the story, without having to invest any time or thought into what they are actually reading? Students think that they have more important things to do with their time than read or write in class. Perhaps this generation is one of the busiest, and instead of being dumb, they just have different priorities that don’t involve reading and writing about classic literature.

Katrina on April 25, 2010 at 1:24 AM said...

I feel that there are many reasons to why our generation is said to the dumbest generation yet. First, I believe that we are considered “dumb,” not because our generation is not smart, but because there have been a change in what is considered necessary to learn. With technology comes the reliance on these inventions for a quick reference and tool that was previously done by man. This makes our generation more advanced in areas, but lacking in what was “common knowledge.” Second, with the increase in technology, more fields of knowledge were made necessary. Such as: text messaging, sending an email, and surfing the web. All of these can easily be completed by the younger generation, but are a struggle for others. Third, the increase of technology has also created many distractions. Cell phones and social networking sites, such as Facebook, drain numerous hours from people everyday. Finally, I believe that we are considered the dumbest generation because we are required to have a broad range knowledge opposed to a concentrated area of study. With the numerous technological advances, there are many more programs and devices used for common activities. I do not believe that my generation is “dumb,” just less focused on the goals of the past and more on the goals of the future.

hoffy on April 25, 2010 at 10:48 AM said...

I think that the argument about books from some people above is completely invalid. Who's to say that reading is the only criteria for making someone smart, or for defining the intelligence level of a generation for that matter. This is no longer a century where people can memorize text and learn how to move "up" through the system. This is a century where every individual must be a THINKER. In order for people to be thinkers, we have to teach them from a young age, how to think. Too often teachers at lower grade levels are so focused on preparing students for the standardized No Child Left Behind tests (http://ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml). In his book, The Global Achievement Gap, Tony Wagner argues that students today need to be challenged to think critically. He stresses that the future of our society is going to be increasingly digital and increasingly faster moving, and consequently memorizing facts to regurgitate onto a piece of examination paper does nobody any good because those facts are irrelevant minutes after they exist. He argues that the technology available in the 21st century IS the answer, not the problem. With the information we have available to us today, we as students can get 10 times the amount of work done that our parents could in a single day. We can understand something going on in China because our internet browsers have the ability to translate Chinese text into English text. Now, you might say that this is all exactly what's making us lazy and "dumb". I would say that it's the opposite. That being able to glean information quickly and accurately creates a smarter, faster planet. Take IBM's push to increase the use of technology. Countless forms of media exist to create a smarter and better planet. Either way you look at it, I think you can find an argument to support your viewpoint on the matter. But when you grew up with your parents, coaches, and teachers telling you to "work smarter, not harder", remember that as you read 3 novels in 15 minutes via Spark Notes, you are gleaning more information at a faster rate than your parents were ever able to do in their academic careers. With that, I leave you with the real question - are we just so much smarter and faster that our parents and "elders" are simply jealous?

Katrina on April 25, 2010 at 2:09 PM said...

I agree that the change in the generations is from harder to smarter. I think that with the change of technology comes a change in what is necessary to know. With online translators and sites such as Sparknotes, our generation is learning the same information at an accelerated rate. Although the information we learn is not as in depth as our parents, the broader knowledge is the change that comes with technology. I believe that we are not dumber, just smarter in how we acquire our knowledge.

Alyssa on April 26, 2010 at 1:34 PM said...

I agree with Kelsey, that today's generation is one that expects instant gratification. As our lives become more streamlined, and technology begins to take over daily tasks that we would normally spend time on, there's this inherent feeling that society is "speeding up," as we become more relient on technology to solve life's answers. Rather than take the time to read books or enjoy the simple things in life, we as a society are far more goal oriented than past generations, the goal being test scores, projects, or moving up the economic hierarchy. Everything we do in today's society is quantified - we pride ourselves on big numbers for output such as revenue, grades, test scores or salar, and small numbers for input such as minimal effort, least amount of waste, or decreased wait time.

JenHaleyBrown on April 29, 2010 at 1:47 PM said...

This is an outstanding blog thread--thanks to all of you!

Anonymous said...

If you would like to increase your experience just keep visiting this web page and be updated with the most recent news
posted here.

Here is my website :: mortgage rates refinance

Anonymous said...

What's up to every , as I am genuinely keen of reading this webpage's post to be updated regularly.
It contains fastidious stuff.

my page :: beitragsvergleich krankenversicherung

Anonymous said...

Hi there! I just wish to give you a huge thumbs up
for your excellent information you have got right here on this post.
I am returning to your website for more soon.

My web site - the best all inclusive resorts

Post a Comment

 

Shallow Observations of Honors College Students Copyright © 2009 Blue Glide is Designed by Ipietoon Sponsored by Online Journal